Figure 2. Area dos contained two phases: get using the pc and you will completing the PLS. That it figure gift ideas a good schematic depiction of the stimulus and get activity design of Region 2 (hate). For every attribute is accompanied by a following negative experience, which was displayed to own 2000 ms or up until reaction. The major range indicated an objective people, while the summation conveyed a poor knowledge. An effective 1000 ms inter-stimulus period was interleaved between for every trait and you will bad experiences.
Earliest, participants was indeed requested to see a story and you will imagine that they had been brand new protagonist (discover Additional Question). 2nd, the players was basically questioned to help you recall related key facts about on their own because of the giving an answer to phrases starting with I am… After that, professionals was coached to learn around three vignettes outlining around three different activities. For every single vignette in it new protagonist and about three targets. Participants had been italian wife questioned to remember the information based on for every single target using totally free bear in mind. Players were after that expected to assume that they was basically into the good romantic relationship on the target.
Reviews and you will Specifications
I made use of Age-Perfect dos.0 to provide those things in an arbitrary buy [we included 15 key facts away from each vignette for the reading materials of each address (look for Additional Table S1)]. After the participants examined the materials, they completed the fresh get task using the pc and then finished the fresh PLS in both Area step one and you may Part dos. Participants offered you to definitely like score each product each address person in Part step one plus one dislike score each bad event for every address member of Part dos, and additionally a couple PLS score pre and post this new negative events.
In part 1, i questioned players to assume themselves just like the protagonist when understanding your situation, and rate each attribute exhibited in terms of exactly how much love it noticed towards an objective according to the displayed features of one’s around three purpose (1 = none; 6 = tall like). Next, we made use of the PLS to measure participants’ thoughts out-of like having the three plans.
To some extent 2 of your own try out, the background attributes regarding An excellent, B, and you can C have been unchanged; but not, we created vignettes in which the targets deceived the newest protagonist, such as for instance by having an event that have someone of your own opposite sex (understand the negative occurrences in Second Desk S1). People was basically next requested to rates how much dislike they noticed to your A great, B, and you can C (step 1 = none; 6 = high dislike). Through to completion out of Part dos, players finished the latest PLS once more to assess its feelings out-of love toward the three objectives.
Analysis
I made use of several analyses to evaluate our very own hypotheses. Brand new ratings out of like analysis, hate studies, and the PLS factors had been averaged contained in this sufferers prior to the analyses. Particularly, we put you to definitely-ways regular steps off investigation out of difference (ANOVA) to evaluate to possess variations in participants’ like product reviews, dislike critiques, and you may PLS scores getting goals An excellent, B, and you will C; such analyses was basically held to own circumstances with and you can instead of betrayal (Part 1 and you can 2). Easy perception evaluation were performed in the event the correspondence effect is high.
Likewise, we used a great step three (target: A, B, and you can C) ? dos (time: ahead of vs. after) two-way constant procedures ANOVA to analyze the level of like level observed by the protagonist when considering the three purpose just before and you will pursuing the bad situations. 2nd, i made use of an excellent 3 (target: A great, B, and C) ? 2 (affect: love vs. hate) two-means regular tips ANOVA to research the partnership between the like and you will hate ratings. Testing out of easy main consequences have been did whenever a discussion effect are mathematically high. At exactly the same time, we put Pearson’s correlation research to check on the fresh correlations between scores getting like and you may dislike. After that, we utilized limited correlations to look at brand new relationship between like and you will dislike controlling for participants’ gender and you will age.
